|
Contact
Information
| Educational
Materials
| Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQs and Fantasies)
| Useful
Links
| Posters
Professional Presentations | Collaboration Opportunities | Professional Publications | Working Papers &Presentations | Listserver Posts This Website is under active construction - July, 2009 Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox 3.0 |
|
Welcome To More
Working
Papers & Presentations - Please Refresh Your Browser For Latest
Site
Updates PCIR
in less than 2 pages - Revised 07/07/09 - A great place to start!
A Critique of Managed Care & Capitation Financed Health Care: A Prologmena - Revised 06/26/09 Risk Induced Professional Caregiver Despair - A Learning Module - Revised 06/18/09 Frequently Asked Questions About PCIR - Revised 06/11/09 Probabilistic Proof of PCIR - Revised 06/16/09 Read
my paper in
Nurse Leader
|
|
Thomas
Cox PhD, RN Critical
Issues Insurers
handle insurance risks more efficiently than individuals.
Large insurers handle insurance risks better than small insurers. Managed care operations use capitation contracts, utilization review, and other tricks of the trade to handle insurance risks by transferring them to smaller organizations and employed health care providers. Clients/Patients of managed care and integrated health care delivery systems are relying on their health care providers to correctly diagnose and treat them at the same time that these providers are acting as these patients health insurance companies - not a good idea at all. Health Care Providers should not be acting as health insurers. Health Care Providers are very inefficient insurers. Managed Care Organizations do not provide better or more efficient care - they provide less care and less efficient care than care financed by indemnity insurance products. Tax deductions of $5,000 for purchasing individual health insurance are wasteful, inefficient, and a regressive tax. Most families cannot afford the price of individual health insurance and most insurers do not want to waste time and money writing individual policies. Individual health account tax benefits are useful for people earning more than $250,000/year. I don't know many people making less than that who expect to benefit from these high income tax breaks. Health Care Intermediaries - the companies that unnecessarily stand between health care providers and health care payors are a lot like ENRON - they provide no intrinsically valuable products or services, divert funds away from health care providers and consumers, and reduce the availability of health care services - Billions of dollars wasted each and every year with no benefit to anyone but these companies while health care costs more and people receive fewer services. |
Professional Caregiver Insurance Risk (PCIR) is the
term
used to
describe the financial and insurance risks assumed by Health Care
Providers in capitation contracts, Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG)
finance mechanisms, and the relationships between Health Maintenance
Organization (HMO) and Integrated Healthcare Delivery Systems and their
employed or contract health care providers. In the final analysis, it
also describes the relationships between nurses and their patients in
hospitals,
clinics, home health, and private practice. Most Americans and most people around the world do not have health insurance. Instead, they are clients of managed care organizations, integrated health care delivery systems, or subject to exclusions, deductibles, and co-payments that have systematically destroyed the concept of health insurance. When they are sick or injured they begin to realize that the benefits they assumed would be available to them are not going to be available because there are long approval process, excessive and unaffordable deductions, or their co-payments are out of their reach. They will, when time is of the essence, wait months or years to access diagnostic and treatment services as their health declines. Professional Caregiver Insurance Risk necessarily reduces net operating revenues and obligates Health Care Providers to perform uncertain levels of future service for payments that will, on average, prove inadequate to meet the costs of doing so in a clinically appropriate and ethical manner. The results of inadequate financing and excessive risk assumption have already severely constrained health provider operations and reduced services to their clients in order to compensate for these carefully constructed revenue inadequacies. Professional Caregiver Insurance Risk disadvantages consumers and Health Care Providers by eliminating true insurance benefits, destabilizing Health Care Providers financially and compromising ethical health care providers. and by moving insurance claims management to the bedside, and promotinng decreased operational efficiencies. Much like the financial system collapse of September, 2008 Professional Caregiver Insurance Risk involves excessive risk assumption by people who are incapable of handling risk at all. Much like gullible homeowners who chose to finance with Adjustable Rate Mortgages and Wall Street tycoons who compromised their companies and clients by their excessive assumption of risk, assuming, incorrectly, that there would always be another ARM available at a cheap rate or another company willing to accept their illiquid asset transfers, Health Care Providers who accept health insurance risks assume that their revenues will be adequate. However, rate adequacy is impossible because the companies that contract with health care providers using these mechanisms cannot compete with legitimate insurance operations who do not transfer insurance risks to health care providers, if they were fairly and adequately compensating their providers for the risks they are assuming. This site is a resource for anyone (Consumers, Providers, Insurers, Politicians, and the Media) who want to understand the core flaws in our health care finance system that will, just as risky mortgages have with banking and finance, destroy the viability of our health care system. While the flaws are severe and should never have been accepted, they are difficult to understand only because all of us assume that the people who designed our current system of health care finance did the best job they could. This, unfortunately is not true. The designers of our health care system and health care finance system built a system that emphasized profit rather than efficiency in every dimension. The core problem with risk transfers to health care professionals are that they are incredibly inefficient. If you do not drive your car with the emergency brake on you know what this means. If you are willing to take a few minutes, have some grasp of statistics, averages, and variation, the flaws are easily understood. If you lack those pre-requisites, coming to understand the flaws will prove a bit more challenging, but most certainly not impossible. The position of risk assuming health care providers is simple enough to understand if you consider common activities such as buying a lottery ticket or visiting a casino. Most lottery ticket buyers and casino visitors lose their money. Most health care providers who accept insurance risk transfers will lose money as well, unless they start restricting their client's access to needed diagnostic and treatment services. |
|
|
This is the official site for
the work of Dr. Thomas Cox PhD, RN on the topic of Professional
Caregiver Insurance Risk. The site and its content are the
property of Dr. Thomas Cox PhD, RN. Unless
otherwise
noted, these contributions are those of the webmaster and do not
necessarily reflect the opinion or policies of anyone other than Dr. Thomas Cox PhD, RN. Professional Presentations | Collaboration Opportunities | Professional Publications | Working Papers &Presentations This Website is under active construction - July, 2009 Copyright 2009 Dr. Thomas Cox PhD, RN.All rights reserved. Hosted by Thomas Cox PhD, RN - Webmaster |