The group added to a draft list of stakeholders and then identified desired outcomes
for the work group process. These desired outcomes can serve both as goals to work towards
and measures for evaluating success. Everyone involved and interested in this process is
encouraged to review this section and suggest refinements that will clarify your desired
outcomes. The purpose of the work group is to achieve desired outcomes, mutually support
attainment of outcomes that may be unique to one group or another and work together to
shape fair and feasible solutions when desired outcomes are conflicting.
Government
Stakeholders
National
- Corp of Engineers
- National Forest
- Federal Dept of Ag (Farm Service Ag. Farmers Home Administration)
State
- DEP: Parks and Rec. Water Facilities, Ecosystem Mgt. Office of Greenways & Trails,
State lands
- DCA
- DOT
- DOH
- DACS: Division of Forestry
- Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission
- UF
- Legislature
Regional Government
- SRWMD
- NCFRPC
Local Government:
- Alachua County
- Columbia County
- Gilchrist County
- High Springs,
- Alachua,
- Newberry
- Gainesville
- Ft. White
Units in Local Government
- Environmental review and permitting
- Planning
- Development review and permitting
- Economic development
- Parks & Recreation
- Waste Management Programs
- Public Works
- Elected Officials
Desired Outcomes for All Levels of Government
- Funding for science
- Authorization to regulate
- Data collection
- Coordination of agencies
- Better land use planning
- Standards for waste & stormwater
- Funding for infrastructure
- Educate public and private interests on their impact on springs
- Inclusion into school curriculum
- Recruitment restrictions on new industries
- Environmental monitoring
- Purchase of dev. rights
Agriculture (Industrial or intensive and non-industrial)
Stakeholders
- Dairy
- Hog
- Poultry
- Mixed and other
- Silva culture - FL Forestry Association
- Horticultural & Agronomic crops (veg., row crops, hay)
- FL organic growers
- Farm Bureau
Desired Outcomes
- Coordination with Suwannee River and Ichetucknee Springs working groups and use their
products
- Identify what ag is appropriate in the basin
- Maintain economic viability of farms
- Reexamine silva culture best practices
- Preserve family farms
- Educate public & ag community about ag best practices
- Preserve ag lands - incentives
Development
Stakeholders
- Residential
- Commercial
- Industrial
Desired Outcomes
- Provide sewage infrastructure
- Better best mgt. practices
- Recreational
Business Uses
Stakeholders
- Recreation (springs) related
- Water users: bottlers
- Potential polluters
Desired Outcomes
- Assurance of water quality
- Maintain and improve
- Maintain access by public
- Better waste mgt. in the parks
- upgrade and more facilities
- Regulate destructive boating
- Regulate & planning of dev. along the river
- Identify potential polluters
- Assistance in water quality improvements
- Guidelines for land use
- Promotion of ecotourism
- Residential construction
- Chamber of Commerce
- Realtors
- Home Builders
- FL Septic Tank Association
- Separate commercial & industrial
- Water bottlers
- Fertilizer Association
- Boating Association
Environmental
Stakeholders
- Sierra Club
- Save Our Suwannee
- Four Rivers Audubon
- 1000 Friends of FL
- Suwannee R. Ducks Unlimited
- Nature Conservancy
- Sustainable Alachua Co. Inc.
- Friends of Oleano
- Republican Party & Democrats
- FL Defenders of the Environment
Desired Outcomes
- To have better scientific research to speak from
- Funding for research
- Information out to public - environment
- Education - funding
- Science - business - and gov. cooperation and joint positions
- A rule-making for environmentally based
- A nutrient standard
- More use of native, non exotic plants
- Acquisition of properties of high envir consistent
- More regulation and enforcement
- Deed restrictions and covenants
- public and private
The General Public
Desired Outcomes
- Maintain clarity
- Minimize algae
- Maintain fish populations
- Involve citizens
- Organization of residents along the river
- Maintain well water quality
- Control population
- Know about lawn maintenance and septic systems
- Recruit volunteers for cleanups
- River keep
- Respect for property rights
- Nat Assn. for Cave Diving
- Barnacle Busters of Gainesville
- Property owners
- Exec. Committee of Alachua Co.
- Recreation users
- Media
- Home owners
Work Group Challenges and Dilemmas
After the group listed the stakeholders and desired outcomes, they were asked to
identify challenges and dilemmas that may be encountered in trying to achieve them. It may
be helpful to keep these in mind as work plans are developed and implemented:
- Personal vs. public interests and competing interests between groups
- How can we have more people and less impact?
- Self education and sharing conclusions
- Property rights vs. regulations and environmental protection
- Generating interest of the general population, educating them and being sure they are
represented in the process
- Having adequate research verifying data, educating people
- Being able to act without perfect information, quantifiable and statistically
significant
- Being able to determine the cost/benefit of change
- Payers may not receive the benefits
- Existing and future nutrient problems
- Being able to establish and define the source of pollution
- Lag: time/expectations for the process and results
- Identify sources of pollution and prioritize where to put the efforts
- The development of best management practices and educating all involved
- The magnitude of problem and the need to educate public/citizens
- Adequate science: (farmers, private sources)
- Establish basic lines for regulation
- Sharing existing info
- Enhancing awareness of existing rules/guidelines/regulations
- Current law