September 18, 1998
Evaluation Form
How well were the meeting objectives achieved?
Good Poor Average
Clarify the work group purpose from different perspectives 5 4 3 2 1 4.45
Identify and prioritize work group activities 5 4 3 2 1 4.12
Form action teams and develop action plans 5 4 3 2 1 4.34
Develop a work group mission and goals statement 5 4 3 2 1 4.00
Rate the following aspects of the meeting?
Clarity of the meeting purpose and plan 5 4 3 2 1 4.56
Balance of structure and flexibility 5 4 3 2 1 3.89
Group involvement and productivity 5 4 3 2 1 4.13
Facilitation 5 4 3 2 1 4.75
Facility 5 4 3 2 1 4.38
Comments:
Prioritizing was not accomplished but with such a mix of people, including average citizen Joe, it would have been difficult.
Overall everything went well and worked well together.
Not enough restrooms
Keep everyone focused on the follow-up and membership, and encourage continued participation.
What did you like best about the meeting?
Mediator kept it moving. Did not bog down on special interests.
Good structure and momentum, good sense of cooperation.
Free flow of ideas - all were heard, moving forward with action plans toward goals.
Too long.
Efficient use of time.
Facilitating works!
How could the meeting have been improved?
More realistic time frame.
Probably no way - with such a mix of people with different ideas, etc.
Minutes from previous meetings.
People’s ideas.
A little over direction by facilitator.
If some kind person is going to provide breakfast food, let us know so we can eat what is brought so it won’t go to waste! Plus, maybe ask for donations for snacks? Pick a date for next meeting and announce it.