|
Contact
Information
| Educational
Materials
| Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQs and Fantasies)
| Useful
Links
| Posters
Professional Presentations | Collaboration Opportunities | Professional Publications | Working Papers &Presentations | Listserver Posts This Website is under active construction - September, 2008 Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox 3.0 |
|
Welcome To Read
my paper in
Nurse Leader
Evaluation of the Presidential Candidates Health Insurance Proposals
|
|
Thomas
Cox PhD, RN Critical
Issues Insurers
handle insurance risks more efficiently than individuals.
Large insurers handle insurance risks better than small insurers. Managed care operations use capitation contracts, utilization review, and other tricks of the trade to handle insurance risks by transferring them to smaller organizations and employed health care providers. Clients/Patients of managed care and integrated health care delivery systems are relying on their health care providers to correctly diagnose and treat them at the same time that these providers are acting as these patients health insurance companies - not a good idea at all. Health Care Providers should not be acting as health insurers. Health Care Providers are very inefficient insurers. Managed Care Organizations do not provide better or more efficient care - they provide less care and less efficient care than care financed by indemnity insurance products. Tax deductions of $5,000 for purchasing individual health insurance are wasteful, inefficient, and a regressive tax. Most families cannot afford the price of individual health insurance and most insurers do not want to waste time and money writing individual policies. Individual health account tax benefits are useful for people earning more than $250,000/year. I don't know many people making less than that who expect to benefit from these high income tax breaks. Health Care Intermediaries - the companies that unnecessarily stand between health care providers and health care payors are a lot like ENRON - they provide no intrinsically valuable products or services, divert funds away from health care providers and consumers, and reduce the availability of health care services - Billions of dollars wasted each and every year with no benefit to anyone but these companies while health care costs more and people receive fewer services. |
Under construction! This page will contain links to useful - and in some cases useless, links. Useful means that the linked sites contribute to understanding and reform of the negative impacts of Professional Caregiver Insurance Risk. Useless means that the linked sites do not contribute to understanding and reform of the negative impacts of Professional Caregiver Insurance Risk but actually impair such efforts. Readers are encouraged to think carefully and very critically about the plans of providers, managed care advocates, and politicians to fix the problems of inadequate health insurance. In particular, if you hear that an actuary is discussing managed care, health insurance, and health care finance you ought to be extremely skeptical. Actuaries should have prevented this decades ago. Their failure to speak out against managed care has been a fundamental breach of their duty to protect the public. Lawsuits against actuaries are probably going to be a hot area for future litigation. If you would like to contribute your links to this site let me know. Thomas Cox PhD, RN
1711 NW 55 Terrace Gainesville, FL 32605 nurse.statistician @ yahoo.com USEFUL LINKS USELESS LINKS # 1 Useless Link - AMA Voice for the uninsured This is the grand-daddy of all useless links - the American Medical Association's proposal for taking care of uninsured Americans. Late to arrive at realizing the enormous problems for uninsured patients, focused primarily on securing future income for medical doctors, and flat out unrealistic. The American Medical Association stood by while physicians and hospitals ignored the needs of patients and fought the rationalization of the health care system proposed by the Clinton Administration in the early 1990s. The AMA has ignored the severe ethical compromise of capitation. The focus on choice for patients is simply wrong-headed. If you are a Medicaid or Medicare patient having trouble finding a physician willing to see you and accept your insurance cards you know that this proposal is like "putting lipstick on a pig". |
|
|
This is the official site for
the work of Dr. Thomas Cox PhD, RN on the topic of Professional
Caregiver Insurance Risk. The site and its content are the
property of Dr. Thomas Cox PhD, RN. Unless
otherwise
noted, these contributions are those of the webmaster and do not
necessarily reflect the opinion or policies of anyone other than Dr. Thomas Cox PhD, RN. Professional Presentations | Collaboration Opportunities | Professional Publications | Working Papers &Presentations | Listserver Posts This Website is under active construction - September, 2008 Copyright 2008 Dr. Thomas Cox PhD, RN.All rights reserved. Hosted by Thomas Cox PhD, RN - Webmaster |