"The Parables No. 14. The Marriage of the King's Son (Matt. xxii. 1-14)" by Charles H. Welch in The Berean Expositor circa 1916. On page 53 of Volume IV. we gave the arrangement of the Parables occurring in Matt. xvi.-xxv., but as some of our readers may be unacquainted with it, we will take out the two corresponding members in order that the place of the parable we are to consider may be seen:- B | xx. 1-16. The Householder and Vineyard. -The call of the labourers:- 1. Early. Many 2. Third hour. called, 3. Sixth and ninth hours. but few 4. Eleventh hour. chosen. B | xxii. 1-14. The Marriage. -The call to the guests:- 1. Bid those who were bidden. Many 2. Again tell them. called, 3. Go therefore to highways. but few 4. The wedding garment. chosen. It will be seen that we have something of a parallel, yet a contrast, for instead of a householder we have a certain king, and instead of labourers we have guests. The concluding words of each parable, however, are the same in the A.V., "Many called, but few chosen." The retention of these words, however, in Matt. xx. 16 is extremely doubtful, and we may be on more certain ground if we say that the closing words of the Parable of the Labourers are, "So the last shall be first, and the first last," while the closing words of the Parable of the Marriage Feast are, "For many are called, but few are chosen." The parable, like those which have already been considered, was addressed to the Pharisees (cf. xxi. 45, and xxii. 1). "Jesus answered, and spake unto them again by parables." It will be noticed, by the use of the word "again," that in the Parables of the Householder, the Wicked Husbandmen, and the Marriage Feast, there is an emphasis upon the fact that an action was repeated. xx. 5. "Again, he went out about the sixth and ninth hour," after having hired two set before. xxi. 36. "Again, he sent other servants, more than the first," after the first messengers were beaten and killed. xxii. 4. "Again, he sent forth other servants," after the refusal to come to the feast. This element of longsuffering and renewal of invitation is a feature that is essentially a part of the parable. Let us first of all examine the figures used, and then attempt with the knowledge gained to understand its import. The characters introduced are, a king, his son, servants, and guests. The parable centres around a marriage feast. This parable contains the first reference to a marriage feast in the N.T., and apart from this the word occurs but once more in Matthew, namely, in xxv. 1O. It is the same word that comes in Rev. xix. 7, 9, and is connected by the added word "supper" of the latter verse to the parallel parable of Luke xiv. 16.. The king's son of course is Christ Himself, and the marriage feast is the marriage supper of the Lamb (Rev. xix.) It will be seen that the servants of the king go out three times, twice to the same people, and once, after the destruction of their city, into the highways. Those to whom the servants went the first time are called, "them that were bidden." The expression is almost a title, and is rendered, "the persons invited," by Darby. The chief thought is that the servants did not give the original invitation, but that it had been given already. They went out to invite them that had been invited. This message met with refusal. Again the king sent the message of invitation, adding the words:- "Tell them that have been invited, behold, I have prepared my dinner, my bullock and the fatlings having been killed, and all things ready, come unto the marriage." These added words are by no means accidental. These two invitations, together with their differences, give us in parable form the ministries that occupy the period commencing with John the Baptist and ending with the close of the Acts of the Apostles. "Them that were bidden" are the people of Israel. Readers of these pages will not need citations from the Scriptures to prove or to demonstrate this statement. John the Baptist, the last of the prophets according to the Old Testament order, announces the good news, "The kingdom of the heavens hath drawn nigh," and further is spoken of as "the friend of the Bridegroom." The Lord Himself, the twelve, and the seventy continue this witness. We know how sadly true the words of the parable are, "they would not come." The second invitation commences with the Acts of the Apostles. There, Peter and the twelve, and those associated ("them that heard Him," Heb. ii. 3, 4), went forth again with the invitation, this time being able to add, "all things are ready." The message of Matthew differs from that of the Acts in this particular. Matt. x. for instance shows us the servants going forth to proclaim the good news, but Matt. xvi. 21,22 makes it clear that those who carried that invitation could not have said "all things are ready," for not only was Peter ignorant of the fact that the Lord must "suffer...and be killed and be raised again the third day," but he even urged the Lord to abandon the idea. Peter's attitude in the Acts is very different. Every recorded address that he gives has the suffering, the death and the resurrection of the Lord as its basis:- "But those things, which God before had shewed by the mouth of all His prophets, that Christ should suffer, He hath so fulfilled, Repent ye therefore" (Acts iii. 18, 19). The initial ministry, that of John the Baptist, was to "prepare the way of the Lord" (Matt. iii. 3), "prepare" being the same word as "ready." It was also "to make ready for the Lord a prepared people" (Luke i. 17). Note, not to make everyone ready, but to make ready a prepared people. In Rev. xix. 7 we read:- "Let us rejoice and exult, and give Him glory, for the marriage of the Lamb is come and His wife has made herself ready." And in xxi. 2:- "And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of the heavens from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband." In the second ministry, that of the Acts of the Apostles, the servants who gave the invitation could indeed lay emphasis upon the fact that all things were ready. "But they neglected it." The word translated "made light of," is the word which occurs in Heb. ii. 3:- "How shall we escape if we have been negligent of so great salvation, which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord (the first invitation), and was confirmed unto us by them that heard Him (the second invitation), God also bearing witness both with signs, and wonders, and with divers miracles, and distributions of holy spirit, according to His will?" This is the second invitation of the parable. That "the signs, wonders, divers miracles, and distributions of holy spirit" are to be read as equivalent to "All things are ready," may be seen by reading Acts ii. 1-4, 22, 23, 43; iii. 12-16; iv. 9-12 (note the reference to the stone rejected by the builders, and Matt. xxi. 42, which immediately precedes the parable of the Marriage Feast), and v. 30. What was the result of this added testimony? "They neglected it." The parable says that "one went to his own field, and one unto his traffic." Readers may remember that in the Parable of the Sower the third sowing indicated the ministry of the Acts (without necessarily precluding the thought that, at the end, all these sowings will be true of the period then). That third sowing "fell among thorns, and the thorns choked them," which by interpretation means:- "That which among thorns being sown, this is he who hears the word and the cares of this age and the delusion of riches, choke the word and it (he) becomes unfruitful" (Matt. xiii. 22) This same cause is expressed in the words, "his own field," and "his traffic." Here is the divine statement as to the failure of the second invitation. This is not all, however. While some "did not care for it," but preferred the things of this age, "the rest" violently opposed. "They seized the servants, insulted and killed them." The Lord Jesus had told His disciples that if the world had hated Him, it would hate them, that He sent them forth as sheep amid wolves. That the days would come when they should be delivered up to be afflicted, hated and killed. This we find in measure in the Acts. Some were imprisoned (Acts iv. 3; v. 18; viii. 3; ix. 1, 13, 21). Stephen was stoned (Acts vii. 59); James was killed with the sword (Acts xii. 2). At the first rejection, which culminated in the betrayal and brutal death of the Lord Jesus, the Lord in wondrous mercy withheld the punishment of which they themselves had thought themselves worthy (Matt. xxi. 41) and sent to those who were guilty of such sins the second ministry of pardon and invitation. The neglect of this "so great salvation," accompanied by the ill-treatment of His servants, was not a second time passed over. This time they had "crucified unto themselves afresh the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame," and "that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected and is nigh unto cursing, whose end is to be burned" (Heb. vi. 8). They had "trodden under foot the Son of God." "For if they escaped not who refused Him that spake on earth (first invitation), much more shall not we, if we turn away from Him that speaketh from heaven" (Heb. xii. 25) (second invitation). And so we read:- "But when the king heard thereof he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city." Between verses 7 and 8 of Matt. xxii. comes the dispensation of the mystery, just as it comes between "the acceptable year of the Lord, and the day of vengeance of our God." When the Lord once again takes up the threads of this purpose, the words of verse 8 onwards become true. "The wedding feast is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy." Because of their rejection of the head stone of the corner, "the kingdom of God will be taken from them, and given to a nation producing the fruits of it." Because of their refusal and neglect they made themselves "unworthy," and failed. The day will come when they shall see those who have come from the east and the west, and from the north and the south, sitting down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of the heavens, but themselves cast out. They knew not the day of their visitation. To no generation of Israel or of men had such exceptional favours been given. They proved unworthy, and forfeited their place. The day will come when the dispersed sons of Abraham will be gathered from the four corners of the earth to sit down in the kingdom. Those who so miserably failed during the two ministries of the Gospels and the Acts will be there, but not in a position of blessedness such as shall those who have thus been gathered in. Weeping and gnashing of teeth (terms that demand a separate study) accompany the vision they have. They were not worthy. It is interesting to note that the word axios, "worthy," and the word hetoimazo, "to make ready," occur prominently in Matthew and in Revelation. Axios occurs seven times in the Revelation. Hetoimazo occurs seven times in the Gospel of Matthew, and seven times in the Revelation. It seems that there is a connection between the being made ready, and the being worthy. If we view the parable and its teaching from the standpoint of the Epistles of the Mystery, we shall be conscious of a difficulty to reconcile the very distinct aspects of truth presented. If we keep within the sphere of the kingdom, the teaching will be clear. In Matt. x. the twelve who were sent forth were to enquire in each village for a "worthy person," and a "worthy house." Verses 37, 38 tell us what constituted "worthiness." Axios occurs seven times in the Acts. There we read that the Jews "judged themselves to be unworthy of eonian life" to the blessing of the Gentiles (Acts xiii. 46-52; compare verse 51 with Matt. x. 14), and that Paul had echoed the words of John the Baptist (Matt. iii. 8) in urging "fruit worthy of repentance" (Acts xxvi. 20). In Rev. iii. 4 we read of some who shall walk with the Lord in white (robes), "for they are worthy," and in xvi. 6 of some who shall have blood to drink because "they are worthy." Of similar import is Luke vii. 4 and xii. 48. It is evident from the usage of the word that it carries with it the idea of meriting or deserving. This is further substantiated by referring to the following:- "Those who are accounted worthy to obtain that age..." (Luke xx. 35). "And take heed to yourselves lest at any time your heart be burdened with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and the cares of life, and that day come upon you unawares...watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things... and to stand before the Son of man" (Luke xxi. 34-36). Here is a close parallel to the condition of heart indicated by "the one to his own field, the other to his traffic," and "the cares of this age, and the deceitfulness of riches." Such attitude of mind is observed in the "wicked servant" of Matt. xxiv. 48-51, where the unexpected coming of the Lord, and the intemperance of the servant, are brought together. It will be observed, further, that the statement concerning the fate of the wicked servant is immediately followed by the words, "Then shall the kingdom of the heavens be likened unto ten virgins," etc., which introduces under another set of figures the two classes of those who have entrance into the marriage feast in view. The same thought (unreadiness) is noticeable; it is that and that alone which distinguishes the two classes of virgins. In the parable before us, those who finally are gathered together, who are found in the highways, are "bad and good"; worthiness is no longer spoken of. These seem to be the elect, who are gathered together by the angels from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. A somewhat parallel change is seen in Luke xiv. 16-24, where, after the servants had been sent to say, "Come, for all things are now ready," and those who were invited made various excuses of a shallow nature, the Lord is angry with them, and sends out first to the streets, and lanes of the city, and causes to be brought in the poor, the maimed and the halt and the blind, and subsequently sends as far as the highways and hedges, compelling them to come in. No worthiness attaches to these, neither are they invited, they are "brought" and they are "compelled." The scenes of the parable in Matt. xxii. change at verse 11, and we are taken into the feast room. The King enters to see the guests, and observes one not clothed with a wedding garment. Upon being questioned as to his entry in that condition, the man is speechless. The King gives orders to his servants to bind him hand and foot, and to thrust him into the outer darkness, where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth. The reason that is given, and with which the parable closes, is, "For there are many invited, but few elected." The wedding garment given by the King to all who were brought into the feast was an outward symbol of election. The Lord had said, "Except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of the heavens." "Fine linen is (or represents) the righteous acts of the saints" (Rev. xix. 8). Peter says to the dispersion, "Give all diligence, add to your faith...give diligence to make your calling and election sure" (2 Pet. i. 5-11). Just as fruit is the sign of growth and life, so the wedding garment is the sign of election. There are other aspects to be considered, and further truth to be discovered along this course which will be the more clearly understood by continuing the study of the parables rather than by attempting an exhaustive study of this one. By way of application, it is well for us, although having something very different from the marriage supper of the Lamb before us either as bride or guests, to remember the exhortation to "walk worthy," and to note particularly the reference to "reigning," a "crown," and a "prize" in the Prison Epistles. The question of the difference between the bride, the wife, the virgins, and the guests will be dealt with in subsequent articles, either in those which deal with the Parables, or those which deal with the Revelation.