"The Parables. No. 11. The Wicked Servant (Matt, xviii. 23-35)" by Charles H. Welch in The Berean Expositor circa 1914-15 We have learned that the series of parables which we are about to consider are linked together by a common theme, the disclosure of the temper and spirit of Israel and the causes which led up to their rejection of the Lord Jesus, and the rejection in turn of themselves from their position as an elect nation before God. The parable was spoken in answer to Peter's question:- "Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Till seven times?" It seems that Peter felt the responsibility of the charge laid upon him. In Matt. xvi. 19 the Lord had said to him :- "I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of the heavens ...... and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." The words are repeated in Matt. xviii. 18, the singular "thou" being changed to the plural "ye," and are there linked by the Lord to the question of forgiving an offending brother. Another link with the original commission to Peter as given in Matt. xvi. is the reference to the church. Matt. xvi. 18 and xviii. 17 are the only references to the church (or ekklesia) in the Gospel of Matthew, and in both passages the reference is linked with this power of binding and loosing, and with the kingdom of the heavens. It seems that Peter was not merely asking the question for his own private information, but was urged to inquire by reason of the great responsibility he felt at having the keys of the kingdom committed to him, and the power in a special manner of binding and loosing connected therewith. How long should he exercise forbearance and forgiveness? The Rabbis taught from Amos. i. 3, &c., to forgive three times and no more. This seems to receive some colour from the words of the Lord in Matt. xviii. 15-17:- (1). "Between thee and him alone," then (2). "If he will not hear, take with thee one or two more," then (3). "If he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican." Peter seemed to realize something of the new spirit, and ventures to put a tentative reply to his own question by saying, "Till seven times?" If Peter had any hesitancy in advancing beyond the tether of Rabbinical teaching it was entirely dispelled by the glorious fulness given in the Lord's answer, "I say not unto thee, Until seven times, but, Until seventy times seven." These words seem to refer back to two passages of Old Testament Scripture, both written during the times of the Gentiles, the one uttered before the nation of Israel had been formed, the other after they had been taken captive to Babylon. The first reference is Gen. iv. 24, "If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold." Lamech is often spoken of as arrogating to himself divine prerogatives; it may be, however, that he has been blamed by Commentators for that which he did not intend. Cain was protected by the Lord, a token was appointed for him in mercy (nearly every one speaks of the "brand of Cain" as though God set a mark upon him in wrath), the word "mark" in Gen. iv. 15 being the word "token", used of the "bow" in the clouds (Gen. ix. 12), and of the "blood" of the passover (Exod. xii. 13). Lamech seems to say to his wives, Be still, fear not, for if Cain who was a murderer was thus protected by a sevenfold avenging, surely I shall be avenged seven and seventyfold; for the words relative to the slaying and wounding in verse 23 may indicate a query rather than state a fact. There seems to be an emphasis, markedly so in the case of Cain, upon the great longsuffering and mercy of our gracious God. The other reference to this seventy times seven is found in Dan. ix., and there in a light infinitely worse than that of Cain or of Lamech. The Lord intervenes and tells the anxious prophet that his prayers shall receive an abundant answer. Daniel had prayed for the forgiveness of his people (ix. 19), and in answer the angel Gabriel is sent to reveal the future of his people to him. "Seventy-sevens are severed off upon thy people and upon thy holy city." Seventy-sevens -- the period of time seems to convey also some lesson of the Lord's longsuffering and forbearance with His rebellious people. If ever a people could be expected to exercise forgiveness to others Israel surely should be the first, for have they not had extended to them untold forbearance from a longsuffering God? The Lord did not omit this from the kingdom prayer of Matt. vi. "Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors" has a direct bearing upon the parable of the servant who, having been forgiven "all that debt," would not forgive his fellow-servant who was his debtor to a much less extent. How many of our readers could say, without reference, what one clause of the Lord's prayer is immediately expanded after the conclusion of the petition? It is not the reference to hallowing the Name, nor the coming kingdom, but just this very clause:- "For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you, but if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses." These words are echoed in the closing verse of Matt. xviii. Here in this parable we have in all its hatefulness one of the factors of Israel's failure. They forgave not; they were not forgiven. Their measure of iniquity was filled up when in their implacable antagonism to the widening mercy of God they forbade the apostle to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, and so wrath came upon them to the uttermost (I Thess. ii. 16). This passage from I Thessalonians should be read with the parable before us, when the "wrath to the uttermost" echoed in the words, "His lord was wroth," and "till he should pay all that was due unto him." This last clause compels us to consider another passage in the Sermon on the Mount, that message calculated to reveal the failure of Israel's attempt at attaining a righteousness by law, and to bring them to repentance. In Matt. v. 22 the Lord says:- "But I say unto you (in contradistinction to what had been taught them), that whosoever is angry with his brother shall be liable to the judgment." The words "without a cause" must be omitted; anger is to be "put away," whether with or without a cause. Continuing the Lord said:- "Therefore, if thou bring thy gift to the altar and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee, leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way, first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift. Agree quickly with thy prosecutor while thou art in the way with him .... and thou be cast into prison. Verily I say unto thee, thou shalt by no means come out thence, *till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing*." Verses 22-26 of Matt. v. must be considered together, the threefold punishment in verse 22, Judges, Sanhedrin, and Gehenna of Fire being balanced by the Judge, the Officer, and the Prison of verse 25. "The uttermost farthing" is parallel to the words of the parable, "all that was due." These words are entirely out of place, nay, they are absolutely untrue the moment they are taken out of their dispensational setting, and are interpreted of the present time. Israel will pay to the uttermost farthing. They did not forgive, and the word is being fulfilled -- they are not being forgiven. A day will come, however, when the prison shall be opened, when the Lord shall say that Israel has received double for all her sins (Isa. xl. 2). There are many who repeat the words, "forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors," who do not believe that the Lord intended to put this principle in operation. The parable of the unforgiving servant is also the parable of the unforgiven servant. The forgiveness granted is cancelled, and payment in full demanded. This is not evangelical doctrine, this is not the truth of the epistles of Paul, it is on an entirely different platform and under an entirely different economy. We have considered the outlying context of the parable rather than the parable itself; its interpretation is simple if we see its connection with Israel and the kingdom. As we consider the other parables of the series, further illustration will be given of the factors which contributed to Israel's rejection. When the Lord Jesus was shamefully and cruelly crucified, even then He said, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do." Forgiveness of "all that debt" was proclaimed in the Acts to the very people guilty of the blood of Christ, but Israel did not enter into blessing, the keys that unlocked the doors of the kingdom closed them again, the loosing was followed by binding, and Israel scattered and homeless, have been delivered unto the tormentors until the Lord's own good time shall come. Thanks be to God that the forgiveness granted under the dispensation of the grace of God cannot be rescinded; we are not forgiven as we forgive others. The teaching is reversed; we forgive others because, whether we forgive or not, God in Christ has forgiven us (Eph. iv. 32). For the help of those who desire to take up the parable for detailed study the following outline may be of service:- Structure of Matt, xviii. 21-35. A | 21,22. Question regarding forgiveness of a brother. B | 23-34. Parable applying the principle to the dispensational | teaching concerning the kingdom of the heavens, and | showing the principle of God's dealings with Israel. | | 1a | The King (23-26). The debt of 1,000 talents. | Command to pay. Servant | falls down, says "Have | patience," and promises to | pay all. | | 1b | Forgiveness (27). Moved with compassion, | looses servant and forgives | debt. | | 2a | The Servant (28,29). The debt of 1,000 pence. | Taken by throat and payment | demanded. Fellow servant | falls down, says "Have | patience," and promises | to pay all. | | 2b | No forgiveness (30). Not moved with compassion. | Casts fellow-servant into | prison until debt is paid. | | 3a | The King (32,33). Servant reminded that all his | debt had been forgiven. | "I had pity." | | 3b | Forgiveness rescinded (34). Servant delivered to | tormentors until payment | made of all due. A | 35. Application regarding forgiveness of a brother.