FREE RADIO AS COMMUNITY RADIO: A FREE RADIO GAINESVILLE PERSPECTIVE
By Riffraff the Radio Rat
Free Radio Gainesville began as an idea generated by an
anarchist affinity group-a small political work group based on ties of friendship and
community-that got organized in 1996. Some of us have lived in Gainesville almost all of
our lives, and others are transplants, but we've been involved with each other through the
youth culture/counterculture scene here for about five years now. Our goals for the
station are basically to attack corporate media and provide a grassroots alternative, to
try to get some of our "radical" ideas out into the community in order to stir
up action and positive change in our town, and to have fun by being creative with a medium
(radio) that has a lot of potential that we see being wasted by corporate culture with its
bottom line agenda and narrow scope. Because of its small scale and D.I.Y. basis,
unlicensed micro-powered radio has the potential to fill in all kinds of gaps that exist
in the range of styles or perspectives available from current legally licensed
broadcasters. "Pirate" stations can fill in the many niches between the
tightly-focused market-based approach of corporate radio and the wide-open hodge-podge of
licensed non-profit community radio. The micropower radio movement is growing
exponentially at this point, and there are many issues of legality, ethics, money and the
lack thereof, and basic orientation and goals of the movement as a whole that current
microbroadcasters are struggling with. One of the biggest issues is the question of how
micropowered FM stations can fit into the communities in which they are based. This
question has legal and economic sides that I will not go into here. For this article I
thought I would focus more on the political and organizational issues that we here at FRG
are working on. I thought I'd tell MRR's readers a little bit about our community and how
we see ourselves and our project in relation to it, in the hope that it will provide other
broadcasters and potential broadcasters with some food for thought about the sort of basic
existential questions like "What is free radio and how the hell are we gonna do
it?"
Our radio station was conceived of as a political and cultural project. In Gainesville we
are fortunate to have a community which has a long history of radical politics, and a long
memory about the history of the various struggles that have gone on, stretching back to
the Civil Rights era. Because of this radical history and the strength of the
counterculture that developed here in the 60's and 70's, there are many opportunities in
this town for radical-minded rebel youth to work with and learn from older activists, and
we have all benefited from this. Gainesville also has a vibrant youth culture that is
centered around a pretty independent-minded music scene, from D.I.Y. punk and hardcore to
indie rock to funk to underground DJ's that spin a variety of styles in the local clubs.
Some of our members who grew up in this scene just took the ball and ran with it, and have
been agitating and fuckin' shit up since they were in high school.
The affinity group that started Free Radio Gainesville got organized in order to make a
specifically anarchist contribution to the local scene. We wanted to create programs and
actions that would complement other local grassroots projects while reflecting our
commitment to anarchism and anti-authoritarianism. We had all been involved in activism
through other groups, some of them more traditional "left-wing" groups, such as
feminist and student organizations, and others more anarchistic in nature, such as Food
Not Bombs. Our little posse met through the natural process of networking that goes on in
small-town community organizing. Initially we all started hanging out as "just
friends," but through our participation in the process of policy-building and
organizing at the local radical infoshop, the Civic Media Center, we became increasingly
aware of our shared commitment to certain political ideas-radical democracy, decentralized
organization, open and inclusive group process.
We first got together as our own separate group to study anarchist history and share ideas
about the theory and practice of anarchism-things like direct action, consensus
decision-making, and non-hierarchical group structures. We did so partly out of
disenchantment with some of the goals and tactics of other local Left groups (pushing for
legislative action, voting drives, etc.) and partly out of a strong desire to participate
in what we all saw as a fast-growing revitalization of anarchy in North America. All of us
were plugged into the anarchist/anti-authoritarian scene through our own personal
interests, most of which were related to the counterculture youth scene. We were reading
the literature, from Profane Existence to the dozens of Riot Grrl zines that exploded onto
the scene in the early nineties; we were doing the work, from Food Not Bombs to Youth
Liberation classes and workshops; we were studying the theory, from Goldman and Kropotkin
to Chomsky and Bookchin; and we were learning the history, from the medieval Free Spirit
to the Paris Commune to the Industrial Workers of the World to Paris 1968 to Active
Resistance 1996. The original study group idea never really got off the ground, but
eventually it developed into a more action-oriented project. Although the radio station
has been our longest and most involved effort, we have also done street theater and
organized solidarity events for the EZLN (the Zapatistas).
Folks who create free radio stations usually do it in one of two basic formats: as the
platform for an individual or a small group's narrowly focused agenda (like WTRA and Black
Liberation Radio in the early days of the micropower movement), or as a community resource
that puts just about anyone on the air (like the early days of Free Radio Berkeley's 24/7
broadcasts). It seems that either of these approaches can involve a station in some pretty
confusing free speech struggles-whose station is it, and who has the right to say what
does or doesn't get on the air on a "free" broadcast frequency? Things can get
especially hairy when one person or a couple of people own the equipment and the space
it's set up in and are trying to make it available to others for use. At Free Radio
Gainesville we are trying to strike a balance between the two extremes of a personal or
narrowly focused set of programming and a wide-open, chaotic and contradictory free speech
zone. We run our station as a democratic collective and have come up with some basic
notions of what we as a group want to see get put out over the airwaves in our name. We do
this for practical as well as philosophical reasons. We are all poor and none of us have
the resources to individually "own" the equipment, and even as a collective the
potential legal expenses are daunting.
On the philosophical side, all of our activity has tended to reflect what I think can be
seen as the central ideal that the affinity group members all share: to have real freedom,
we must have a dialectic, a creative merger or dialogue, between the free and open desires
of the individual, and the material and spiritual needs of the community. This is where I
think our group, and others like it, part ways with both the counterculture and the
traditional Marxist Left. To me this is what anarchism is all about-smashing through the
brainfences that traditional ways of thinking trap us in: Either/Or, Black/White, and so
on-and trying to engage in practices that bypass or resolve the contradictions that keep
us all confused and alienated from each other within our daily lives. We see this problem
cropping up over and over again in society as a whole, and we struggle with it in our own
personal lives and in the process of creating organizations and doing political work. The
question is, how can we recognize differences, honor them, and then get beyond them to
find common points that will allow us to get together and do work that produces benefits
for us all? How can we reconcile the deep individual desire for total freedom that
anarchism is based on with the practical reality that humans are social critters and who
have to work together to survive?
This type of problem comes up over and over again in political struggles. I'll use some
Gainesville issues as an example. The city council tries to sell the us citizens a lovely
array of "development" schemes to bring "jobs" and "economic
growth," to our humble burg, but they always seem to end up being the same old
sweetheart deals for local developers and big-business corporate franchises who provide us
with more shitwork for less pay and the same old Korporate Amerika strip malls, facades,
and dangerous, polluting industry. Meanwhile the little mom-n-pop businesses that provide
unique local culture and a semi-autonomous local economy go down the drain from the
competition. "Downtown redevelopment" translates into creating safe zones for
the local Richie Riches and their "vision" for our town. This means moves like
trying to push the poor folks and "houseless" people out by threatening the
shelters and the churches that provide services; putting police and economic pressure on
the area's only punk rock bar to try to force it out of the heart of downtown, where it
currently thrives and festers like a dirty little thorn of rebellion in the side of their
oh-so-carefully planned corporate Kookie Kutter Kommunity; trying to force all the local
papers to buy the same expensive, butt-ugly metal distribution boxes so that the
independent papers' colorful old D.I.Y. boxes won't hurt their precious eyes; and
selectively enforcing a lame little city ordinance that makes it a crime for activists,
homeless people, and punk kids to hang flyers on city utility poles while Coca-Cola
plasters those same poles with giant Olympic hype posters.
When you step outside of the confines of political debate that the corporate machine
presents, it is easy to see how there could be many different kinds of solutions to the
problems that a community faces, and we want to promote our particular vision of
cooperative, collectively-created solutions that are based on real democracy. For example,
if a neighborhood in town is having social and economic problems, let the people who live
there come together to come up with ideas about how to solve them, and then vote on the
proposals that they themselves come up with. Let them bring in outside "experts"
for advice and reach out to others for material aid if they freely choose to do so. In the
corporate capitalist mentality that rules now, there is only one way to come up with
"solutions"-top-down government or business power. Their solution to the problem
of "neighborhood decay": opening up "new markets" for big-money
investors (strip malls, yuppy apartment complexes) and providing more fodder for the
Prison Industrial Complex with more cops and harsher laws. If an idea does not somehow
generate more power and more profit for a privileged minority, it just isn't worth
considering. However, it seems to me that the success of micro-powered radio at the
grassroots level is just one real-life example that exposes what a lie that kind of
thinking is.
In December of 1997 the established FRG collective decided to formally draft policy
pertaining to decision-making and the addition of new collective members and new broadcast
programming. We had been broadcasting since July with minimal publicity in order to build
up our shoddy equipment and try to work the bugs out. After having a five-hour intensive
meeting and brain-storming session, we came up with bare-bones written policies and some
basic ideas about how to go more public with our station and reach out to other elements
of the community at large. We also drafted and published a manifesto explaining the goals
and intent of the project to the public. It has always been very important to us that we
make it clear to other folks here in town what our reason for doing radio is-we are not
simply opening up a community free-speech zone where all points of view get equal time. We
have a mission to put certain perspectives on the air, to create a zone of free speech for
certain marginalized or excluded voices that we as a group see as valuable and needing to
be heard, and our responsibility to our community lies in living up to that goal. There is
no room on our frequency, to use an extreme example, for the local KKK. Their interests
run directly counter to the kind of political and economic empowerment we hope to promote.
Let them find their own methods of outreach, and if they do, then let the people decide if
they want to pay attention. To use an example from our day-to-day practice, the only time
any word from the local New York Times syndicate newspaper gets on the air is when the
Radical News Hour reader uses it as fodder for attacking piss-yellow corporate journalism,
comparing and contrasting it with coverage of the same issue from alternative press
sources.
To build our organization and expand our programming, we decided to stick to grassroots
methods of outreach: speaking out about Free Radio Gainesville at social gatherings and
political events, publishing our manifesto and recruiting ads in the local radical paper,
on-air requests for feedback and programming ideas, and personally recruiting individuals
that we encountered on the street, in meetings, or at work. We ultimately intend on
raising money the traditional grassroots way: music benefits, t-shirts, bumper-stickers,
and soliciting funds from moneyed liberals who support our cause. We constantly request
from our listeners music and equipment donations. We especially encourage music from local
artists so that we can better promote our unique cultural scene. So far we have agreed not
to accept money from anyone in exchange for advertisement. Instead it is our hope to
establish barter relations (relations based on mutual assistance) with locally owned music
stores, clubs and Non Governmental organizations.
Prospective members are asked to write a proposal detailing their program idea and how
they think it might compliment our mission. They are then given a four week trial slot
during which time the existing collective listens in. The trial member is encouraged to
attend meetings to better get acquainted with FRG members and to receive feed back on
their program. At the end of this trial period the prospective member is invited into the
collective as a full member or rejected if the group does not have a solid consensus that
their program complements the mission of Free Radio Gainesville. For example, a DJ that
persist in being misogynist, racist, homophobic, puts out sloppy, self-contradictory
information, or refuses to respect and take care of the equipment or the space. Since
these policy decisions were formalized we have added one new full member and are trying
out three more.
The addition of new members to FRG was initially based on affinity. We formed the initial
collective by pooling our money and resources on the principle of "From each
according to his/her ability, to the project according to its needs." We began
building the group in size and diversity by inviting comrades of ours from other groups
and friends from our immediate scene or community to join the collective and do programs.
Among our first new recruits were Food Not Bombs activists and a woman who was FRG's
number one listener and supporter in our early experimental broadcast days. But we knew
that in order to expand our on-air time, broaden the scope of information that we put out
, and serve more parts of the community, we would need to take on programmers from outside
our own immediate circle of friends and activists. In our case, that meant people from
outside the mostly white, mostly middle-class dropout culture. The greatest obstacle we
face being in a small, Old South town, which is also a university town, is the gap between
the white counterculture street scene and the black cultural scene and street scene. The
social/political breakdown of the original collective is like this: not all of us are
white, most of us are queer, more of us are male than female, almost all of us come from
middle-class backgrounds, some of us are on and off the street, all of us work shit jobs
to get by, a couple of us have college degrees, most of us are somewhere in our twenties
agewise. The programming that we were doing on the station did and still does reflect this
reality, but by slowly bringing in more people and more programming from different
sub-communities, and being as conscious as we can of the complex dynamics that we turn
loose within the group whenever we make changes, we have managed to maintain the radical
mission of the station and add voices that definitely reflect a broader slice of the
Gainesville community as a whole.
|